I have been observing the flagrant use of another kind of "double negative" recently - the constant negative campaigning being done by political candidates in their television and radio spots.
As I recall, just a few short years ago, politicians in both major political parties swore up and down that candidates would no longer be presenting negative, name-calling campaigns.
I guess they didn't get the memo in Nebraska, where Senatorial candidates Pete Ricketts and Ben Nelson have been furiously slinging arrows back-and-forth, ranting about what the other did or did not do. Lately, Ricketts' team has even taken to screening a "delightful" (not) 'music video,' set to the tune of the old children's classic "Old McDonald Had a Farm," satirizing Senator Nelson.
Of course, Nebraska is not the only political battleground where the "no negative campaigning pledge" seems to have gone out the window - right, Mr. Culver and Mr.Nussle?
I am one voter who would just like to hear 1) what the candidate plans to do if elected, and 2) what their plan is to accomplish that goal. What I do NOT want to hear is what the other guy is going to do to screw things up.
If both candidates sling the mud, that's a "double negative," right?
And Mrs. D. said that's a no-no.


